Trek @ 40

A nice nod to the Trek franchise by former contributer, Ron Moore.

'Star Trek' at 40: Still a beacon of hope

ALTADENA, California Four decades ago, when the starship Enterprise first settled into orbit around Planet M-113 on Sept. 8, 1966, I was 2 years old. I could not have known it at the time, but "Star Trek" would change my life.

To say that any television show has changed one's life is to invite both mockery and pity for a poor geek who must surely have been denied direct sunlight for the better part of his days. But in lieu of offering proof that I do not, in fact, still reside in my parents' basement, let me simply tell you how "Star Trek" informed the way I look at the world.

"Star Trek" is often reduced to kitsch: Kirk's paunch, Spock's pointy ears, green- skinned alien girls. But it was more than escapism and rubber- suited aliens. It was a morality play, with Captain James T. Kirk as a futuristic John F. Kennedy piloting a warp-driven PT-109 through the far reaches of the galaxy.

Kirk, for me, embodied an American idea: His mission was to explore the final frontier, not to conquer it. He was moral without moralizing. Week after week, he confronted the specters of intolerance and injustice, and week after week found a way to defeat them without ever becoming them. Kirk may have beat up his share of bad guys, but you could never imagine him torturing them.

A favorite quote: "We're human beings, with the blood of a million savage years on our hands. But we can stop it. We can admit that we're killers, but we won't kill today." Kirk understood humanity's flaws, yet never lost faith in our ability to rise above the muck.

"Star Trek" painted a noble, heroic vision of the future, and that vision became my lodestar.

As I grew into adolescence, the show provided a handy reference against which to judge the questions that my young mind began to ask: What is the obligation of a free society toward the less fortunate? Does an "advanced" culture have the right to spread its ideas among more "primitive" cultures?

And as I grew, and my political views took shape, I treasured "Star Trek" as a dream of what my country could one day become - a liberal and tolerant society, unafraid to live by its ideals in a dangerous universe, and secure in the knowledge that its greatness derived from the strength of its ideas rather than the power of its phasers.

In my 20s, through a combination of luck and determination, I fulfilled my childhood dream - I became a writer for "Star Trek."

For 10 years, I helped propel the latter-day incarnations of "Trek" into new territory while keeping alive the set of moral principles I'd taken to heart. As I plotted the adventures of the Enterprise-D and the travails of the space station Deep Space 9, I gradually became interested in pushing the boundaries of "Star Trek," and began to let Captains Picard and Sisko find the shades of gray in a universe Kirk sometimes saw only in black and white.

Science fiction on film and television has, over the past four decades, moved decisively away from the optimism of "Star Trek." "Blade Runner," "Alien" and "The Matrix" posit much darker, dystopian futures; even the "Star Wars" movies posit the rise of a galactic empire founded on "the dark side." Explanations abound for this shift, but my theory is that "Star Trek" set the gold standard for the idealistic vision of tomorrow and no one has successfully challenged it.

Nowadays, it may appear that I've turned a blind eye to my lodestar as my characters in the television series "Battlestar Galactica" behave in ways that would've been unthinkable in the "Star Trek" universe. But "Battlestar Galactica" remains very much informed by the lessons I learned from that slightly paunchy man in the gold pajama top.

My characters may not have all the answers but they contain kernels of both good and evil in their hearts and continue to struggle for salvation and redemption against the darker angels of their natures. Their defeats are many, their victories few, but somehow, some way, they never give up the dream of finding a better tomorrow.

And, thanks to a 40-year-old television show, neither do I.

Star Trek: Special Edition!

I kept the TV on way later than usual tonight to check out one of the remastered Trek episodes. As luck would have it my favorite episode, Balance of Terror, was being aired. The changes made in episode are fairly cosmetic--the Romulan warbird received a CGI spit and polish and the Enterprise "phasers," which look suspiciously like photon torpedoes, got an upgrade too. If this episode is any indication, it looks like the reworked bits will mostly concern exterior and background shots. I thought I was going to be really put off by the changes (Greedo shoots first, anyone?), but I think the Star Trek gang knew better than to mess with greatness. Let's face it, the Star Trek franchise has enough problems at the moment. Who needs a bunch of angry fanboys screaming, "Bring back the man-in-suit Gorn!"?